Skip to content
DoctorDODemo data
Signed in as Alex Morgan, alex.morgan@contosoai.example, Admin.

Demo data: ContosoAI (fictitious). Nothing here is a real company, device or person.

Estate · demo data

Sites

42 sites, with remote workers counted as one. At 36 sites, devices disagree on something peering depends on.

See every site on the topology map
Sites meeting the goal
14 of 42
judged against the company goal of 60%; 56% of devices are in them.
Short of the goal
109.1 TB
more would come from peers and cache if the 28 sites short of the goal reached it. Most from the CDN: Bengaluru, 28.6 TB.
Devices disagree
36 sites
on something peering depends on, most often Peer connections (36 sites).
Critical issues
34 sites
with 8,783 critical issues between them. Connected Cache served bytes at 23 of 42 sites.

All sites

Lowest efficiency first · efficiency is volume-weighted · 14 of 42 meet the company goal of 60% (change). Select a site to see its devices.

Showing 42 of 42 sites

Site efficiencyGoal, 60%

  1. Frankfurt

    0.0%

    Below the company goal540 critical issues

  2. Hamburg

    0.0%

    Below the company goal83 critical issues

  3. Boston

    0.0%

    Below the company goal372 critical issues

  4. Chicago

    0.0%

    Below the company goal372 critical issues

  5. Osaka

    0.0%

    Below the company goal219 critical issues

  6. Remote workers (VPN)

    0.0%

    Below the company goal9 critical issues

  7. Pune

    18.3%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections5 critical issues

  8. Perth

    19.0%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections78 critical issues

  9. Chennai

    19.6%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections2 critical issues

  10. Fukuoka

    19.7%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections

  11. Atlanta

    20.3%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections2 critical issues

  12. Belfast

    21.5%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections

  13. Melbourne

    23.2%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections1 critical issue

  14. Bengaluru

    23.7%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections1,856 critical issues

  15. Vancouver

    24.3%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections3 critical issues

  16. Montreal

    24.5%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections

  17. Edinburgh

    24.7%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections

  18. Madrid

    24.9%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections

  19. Hyderabad

    26.7%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections881 critical issues

  20. Denver

    27.1%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections

  21. Seattle

    28.1%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections1,033 critical issues

  22. Toulouse

    28.3%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections

  23. Sydney

    30.1%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections553 critical issues

  24. Toronto

    33.8%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections657 critical issues

  25. Berlin

    33.9%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections556 critical issues

  26. Austin

    34.1%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections551 critical issues

  27. Manchester

    35.8%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections618 critical issues

  28. Lyon

    36.0%

    Below the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections281 critical issues

  29. San Francisco

    67.6%

    Meeting the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections15 critical issues

  30. London

    67.7%

    Meeting the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections19 critical issues

  31. New York

    68.0%

    Meeting the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections6 critical issues

  32. Singapore

    68.1%

    Meeting the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections5 critical issues

  33. Amsterdam

    68.9%

    Meeting the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections7 critical issues

  34. Dublin HQ

    69.0%

    Meeting the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections38 critical issues

  35. Paris

    69.0%

    Meeting the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections5 critical issues

  36. Tokyo

    69.3%

    Meeting the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections3 critical issues

  37. Cork

    69.6%

    Meeting the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections1 critical issue

  38. Munich

    69.8%

    Meeting the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections7 critical issues

  39. Stockholm

    80.4%

    Meeting the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections2 critical issues

  40. Oslo

    80.4%

    Meeting the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections1 critical issue

  41. Copenhagen

    81.0%

    Meeting the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections2 critical issues

  42. Helsinki

    81.4%

    Meeting the company goalDevices disagree on Peer connections